Category Archives: Economy

Reno Real Estate: Are We at the Bottom?

Where is Reno in in our current market condition for real estate? Is this a good time to buy a house? Should I jump in right now? Should I wait?

If you were to ask a Realtor, the answer would likely be that we’ve finally reached the bottom and now we are in the long, slow, arduous climb back to where we “truly belong”. But, have you ever seen a time when a realtor didn’t say that now was a good time to buy? Couldn’t be a better time?

Me, neither. I’m not suggesting anything nefarious about realtors, here. I just think that if they’re not optimistic about their product, how could they do a good job, anyway?

But all of that is beside the point.

As the saying goes, “the reason for a horse race is a difference of opinion.”

Keith Jurow, writing in Businessinsider.com is firmly convinced that we are still headed for a housing collapse. He examined major markets across the country and found price declines. Exceptions were in Nevada, Arizona and Florida where we have already taken major hits. Foreclosures are way down in most areas but the number of delinquencies are still high.

We are still facing some very serious delinquencies.  In many cases the problems were caused, or made worse by government action such as AB-284 here in nevada.  This caused the banks to drastically slow their foreclosures.  Consequently, the shadow inventories have grown substantially.

Nevada Foreclosure Filings

Nevada Foreclosure Filings: AB-284 Effective Oct., 2011

Jurow expects another significant drop in prices. Move-up buyers have disappeared because they lost most of their equity. First time buyers are usually limited to entry level properties. So, what’s left are the investors who are focusing on the “sand” states, which include Nevada. That may help us here in Reno.

Added to this we see a large number of potential sellers who, likewise, have little or no equity and are unable to sell. They may have taken out a HELOC or a cash out re-fi.

The bottom line is that I’m not optomistic.

Read more here.

You may also be interested in . . .

Being a Real Estate Agent Can Be Hazardous to Your Health

Who’da thunk? Realtoring can be dangerous to you health.

Apparently, unhappy clients have expressed their disappointment by getting physical and have even caused fatalities.

Did they really expect their short sale to sell for 30% above the market?

Read more: http://realtormag.realtor.org/daily-news/2012/05/01/attacks-against-real-estate-professionals-surge

You may also be interested in . . .

Family of Four Lives in 168 Square Foot House

What would you do if you had just lost your job? You did not want welfare? How cheaply could you live? Do you think you could live in a 168 square foot house? Along with 3 other family members. What would you be willing to do to get out or stay out of debt?

This family built their house for $12,000 and then managed to save for their next larger home. I cheer them on and wonder if I could do it myself.

You may also be interested in . . .

Clear Capital Real Estate Market Report

The Clear Capital report happens to be one of the better real estate data reports available.  It has far too much for me to excerpt for you.  Better to read it your self.

It shows a slight price decline that appears to be driven mostly by the large numbers of REO’s.

Read the report: http://www.clearcapital.com/company/MarketReport.cfm?month=March&year=2012

You may also be interested in . . .

FHA Loans Soon to Become More Expensive

Do you need/want an FHA loan? It will soon get more expensive.

Expect to pay more. FHA needs the money and thinks you can afford it. The new fees are set to begin April 1 of this year.

Even though FHA itself doesn’t make the loans, it insures them.

First, the mortgage insurance premium will rise from 1.15% to 1.25% for loans under $625,000. The premium will be even larger for larger loans.

FHA will also increase the upfront mortgage premium from 1.0% to 1.75&.

According to The New York Times, a borrower with a 3.5 percent down payment with a mortgage of $193,000 can expect to pay an upfront mortgage premium alone of $3,377, compared to the prior $1,930

The premium can be rolled into the mortgage.

The FHA expects to raise $1.25 Billion additional revenue by Sept. 2013.

The NAR (Realtors) is strongly opposed to this action.

Read more on mortgage fees.

You may also be interested in . . .

Freddie Mac Lied to the Nation

If you ever bought or even tried to buy a short sale you are aware of the problems and difficulty in completing the transaction.  You might have wondered, “how could the banks be so obstinate?”

We now learn that even though the banks may have been difficult to work with, much of the problem came from the government in the name of Freddie Mac.  “But, I thought the government wanted to help us,” you say.

Freddie went out of their way to paint the investors as the enemy.  They issued policy letters describing potential mortgage fraud with the intention of making the investor out to be the criminal.  The only problem was that Freddie itself was the real fraudster.

The truth is that Freddie Mac actually placed their bets against the housing crisis actually ever getting solved.  Freddie made money whenever they were able to stop a short sale.  Freddie benefited whenever the rest of us lost.

For more than a year, Freddie Mac has adopted numerous policies designed to prevent the private purchase of toxic assets and forced servicers to enforce these policies. Demands for unreasonable offers on short sales, delays in processing short sales, affidavits preventing resale of their properties after being rehabbed and deed restrictions on real-estate-owned properties restricting resale price are among the myriad obstacles private buyers face in trying to buy Freddie’s inventory.

Besides delaying the unwinding of the troubled entity, several of these policies may in fact be illegal. Restricting the ability of private buyers to resell their properties and attempting to dictate resale value constitute unreasonable restraint on alienation. In plain English, once Freddie sells one of its toxic assets, it has no standing in future transactions related to the property.

Freddie has attempted to justify these policies through a taxpayer-funded media campaign arguing that the act of buying, rehabbing and reselling a property constitutes a crime and is inherently an act of fraud. Both Freddie and Fannie Mae have worked with enforcement officials to convince them of this lie. To the embarrassment of these enforcement officials, Freddie left out one important detail: Every time it stopped a short sale, Freddie made money.

Read more: http://www.rollcall.com/issues/57_96/john_grant_end_freddie_mac_policies_against_private_market-212409-1.html?pos=oopih

You may also be interested in . . .

Reno Makes another Worst of List

Here’s another “best of”, “worst of” list and Reno wins another prize. It may not be the prize that Reno would like on its resume although it’s not necessarily our fault. It is not just a story about Reno or Northern Nevada. This is an American problem, and I believe it was completely caused by politicians.

This is a list from 24/7 Wall St. of 9 cities that the article claims were nearly destroyed by the recession. Reno was scored in second place.

2. Reno-Sparks, NV
> Pct. jobs recovered: 1.6%
> Q4 2012 jobs: 187,600
> Pre-recession jobs peak: 225,200
> Recession jobs trough: 187,000
> Pct. jobs lost: 16.9%

Between 2007 and 2010, the median home value in Reno-Sparks, Nevada declined 37.4%, the 13th biggest drop in the country among metro areas. The problems of the recession have plagued states in the southwest, which once had booming housing markets, arguably more than any other part in the country. From the beginning of 2007 to the third quarter of this year, jobs are projected to decline by 38,200, or 16.9% of the workforce. And according to the report, only 600 jobs, a mere 1.6%, will be recovered by the end of the year.

Read more: http://247wallst.com/2012/01/19/the-nin-cities-that-havent-recovered-from-the-recession/

You may also be interested in . . .

Foreclosure Starts are Down Across the West

Foreclosure starts are down all across the West Coast for December. Reduced filings were reported in California, Nevada and Washington. Nevada showed drops of 14%.

According to ForeclosureRadar the drops were due to the closing of trustee sale locations in California. Riverside County passed an ordinance prohibiting solicitation on all County property. California law only specifies that the location must be within the County where the property is located and must be published in the Notice of Sale. Nevada law states

2. All sales of real property must be made:
(a) In a county with a population of less than 100,000, at the courthouse in the county in which the property or some part thereof is situated.
(b) In a county with a population of 100,000 or more, at the public location in the county designated by the governing body of the county for that purpose.

Here in Reno trustee sales are conducted on the steps of the Court House on Virginia Street.

The slow down in Nevada was attributed to AB 284 which established new foreclosure rules requiring the lender and trustee to certify that they have done everything correctly.

“Nevada’s new foreclosure rules appear on track to bring a near complete halt to foreclosures in that state,” said Sean O’Toole, founder and chief executive officer of ForeclosureRadar.

“In the near term this will certainly help homeowners who were facing foreclosure, eviction, and potentially deficiency judgements. Longer term, we believe there will be unintended consequences for the state as business declines for the many real estate related companies that would normally service, resell and finance those foreclosures.”

Read more: http://www.housingwire.com/2012/01/13/foreclosure-starts-drop-across-the-west-coast?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+housingwire%2FuOVI+%28HousingWire%29

You may also be interested in . . .

The Informal Economy

Are you a part of the informal economy? Do you do things outside of a formal work structure. Do you get paid in cash, under the table? Do you buy and sell using Craigslist, eBay or other routes? Do you ever hire the day laborers hanging out on Galletti Way?

The governments (Federal, State & Local) frown on this sort of behavior. After all, how would they get their cut. And, perhaps even more, how can they regulate and control you?

Here is a story of an itinerant New York City candy vendor who makes upwards of $150/day selling candy in the subway. It’s also a report on some of the facts of life about this segment of the economy.

It’s estimated that about 60% of all working people on earth work in an informal economy. A great benefit is seen because the independent entrepreneurs are not sitting on welfare or collecting food stamps.

What do you think? Would we be better off if this were legal?

You may also be interested in . . .

  • No Related Posts

Would You Catch a Falling Knife?

The question arises, has the real estate market bottomed out? And is this a good time to buy? Can you compare buying real estate today to catching a falling knife?

If you ever wanted to see a super analysis of the real estate market check out this article by Jeff Harding. He covers the many aspects of both residential and commercial and what I read, it ain’t pretty. He has great information and much more than I could tell.

he bottom line on the residential market is that home values will continue to decline in 2012 on a national basis, and if, as we are forecasting, the economy continues to flatten or decline, there will be no good news next year. Again, as we know, there is no “national” market and each locality has its own dynamics. But these data will have a negative impact on home buyers’ attitudes about the housing market.

The bottom line on the CRE markets is that prices appear to be flattening, but there is a substantial refi problem continuing to overhang the markets. As the bulk of these loans need refinancing at their maturity dates, it is likely that many of them will not be able to replace their loans and will face the requirement to come up with additional capital or face foreclosure, thus delinquency rates will remain high, especially in the sub-Class A markets. This has been the story of CRE for the past four years and there are no economic dynamics that would change it.

It is unlikely that investors and home buyers will be willing to catch a falling knife.

As he mentions, this describes a nationwide market and the reality is that all real estate markets are local. What happens nationally may not be the story for here in Nevada or in the Reno-Sparks area.

You may also be interested in . . .