Category Archives: Fraud

Freddie Mac Lied to the Nation

If you ever bought or even tried to buy a short sale you are aware of the problems and difficulty in completing the transaction.  You might have wondered, “how could the banks be so obstinate?”

We now learn that even though the banks may have been difficult to work with, much of the problem came from the government in the name of Freddie Mac.  “But, I thought the government wanted to help us,” you say.

Freddie went out of their way to paint the investors as the enemy.  They issued policy letters describing potential mortgage fraud with the intention of making the investor out to be the criminal.  The only problem was that Freddie itself was the real fraudster.

The truth is that Freddie Mac actually placed their bets against the housing crisis actually ever getting solved.  Freddie made money whenever they were able to stop a short sale.  Freddie benefited whenever the rest of us lost.

For more than a year, Freddie Mac has adopted numerous policies designed to prevent the private purchase of toxic assets and forced servicers to enforce these policies. Demands for unreasonable offers on short sales, delays in processing short sales, affidavits preventing resale of their properties after being rehabbed and deed restrictions on real-estate-owned properties restricting resale price are among the myriad obstacles private buyers face in trying to buy Freddie’s inventory.

Besides delaying the unwinding of the troubled entity, several of these policies may in fact be illegal. Restricting the ability of private buyers to resell their properties and attempting to dictate resale value constitute unreasonable restraint on alienation. In plain English, once Freddie sells one of its toxic assets, it has no standing in future transactions related to the property.

Freddie has attempted to justify these policies through a taxpayer-funded media campaign arguing that the act of buying, rehabbing and reselling a property constitutes a crime and is inherently an act of fraud. Both Freddie and Fannie Mae have worked with enforcement officials to convince them of this lie. To the embarrassment of these enforcement officials, Freddie left out one important detail: Every time it stopped a short sale, Freddie made money.

Read more: http://www.rollcall.com/issues/57_96/john_grant_end_freddie_mac_policies_against_private_market-212409-1.html?pos=oopih

You may also be interested in . . .

Nevada Notaries Charged With Fraudulent Foreclosure Documents

Just in case you may have forgotten about the robo-signing scandal that first came to light in Florida, I thought that I might jar your memory. Florida happens to be a judicial foreclosure state while Nevada is non-judicial. In Florida’s case, the fraudulent document signers work ended up in court. But, the foreclosures in Nevada were for the most part settled at public auction on the court house steps. These never had to face a judge.

Now, it has come to light that Nevada is not immune for fraudulent signing. At least three notaries have now been charged with notarizing documents without actually witnessing the signing.

The three notaries had all worked for LPS, (Lender Processing Service) to handle paperwork for the banks. This is the same company at the center of the problem in Florida. Apparently, they had such a workload such that they could never witness every document within the time allotted.

The problems here, were addressed in AB 284. Now the foreclosing entity must certify that their documents are in order. The end result is that foreclosures will now take longer to complete the process.

Read More: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505245_162-57337111/3-nevada-notaries-named-in-foreclosure-fraud-case/

You may also be interested in . . .

New Short Sale Rules From Freddie Mac

Effective Jan, 1, 2012 everyone involved with Freddie Mac short sales will be required to sign an affidavit and be held liable for any misrepresentations they may have caused. This is purportedly to ensure that the transaction is at arms length.

In August, the government-sponsored enterprise alerted real estate agents to the rise in shady short sale deals. The main concern is flopping. There is a growing trend of real estate agents on the buy-side of the deal failing to disclose other bids on the property, rigging the sale at a lower price.

This was based on the theory that if a buyer flipped the property and made a profit, the deal must have defrauded the bank. If we extend this concept then every business that buys a product or service and re-sells it at a higher price would be committing fraud. We know that any merchant that doesn’t make a profit soon goes out of business.

We must realize that this absurd notion comes from the government where little makes any sense. But take care because they will look for any excuse to make an example of you.

This is from the same Fannie and Freddie that has already cost the taxpayers $169 billion and have paid huge bonuses to their executives for losing money.

How big are the paychecks going to top Fannie and Freddie executives? Big. Really, really big. Since the agencies went into conservatorship, Fannie and Freddie’s top six executives have received $35 million in compensation, including millions in bonuses, even as borrowers struggled to keep their homes and got no meaningful relief.

Read more:

You may also be interested in . . .

Would I buy a Belvedere Condominium?

My posts on this blog about the Belvedere condominium project and developer Bijan Madjlessi generated more interest than any other so far. Readers have even contacted me asking what I thought about buying units in the project.

I must begin with this disclaimer because except for what I have read or learned in newspaper or other reports my direct knowledge of the Belvedere is almost nonexistent. I’ve never been in the Belvedere nor have I ever met any of the players that I am aware of. As I said the extent of my knowledge has come only from news articles or from comments on this or other blogs. Therefore I believe I am not qualified to recommend in any way either positive or negative about the benefits of purchasing a Belvedere condominium unit.

My concern with the Belvedere project is that I am not convinced that the legal difficulties are yet over. There are some other reasons that I do not like condominiums but I will save that for another time.

As we have learned from the Reno Gazette Journal, the Belvedere condominiums were purchased at a Washoe County tax foreclosure sale by David Lonich, the attorney for Madjlessi. It would appear to me that Lonich is nothing but the straw buyer for Madjlessi.

We learned that Madjlessi failed to pay his mortgages, failed to pay his vendors, and failed to pay property taxes, thus resulting in tax foreclosure.

We learned that Madjlessi had been arrested in California for insurance fraud. Then as information began to grow we learned that Madjlessi was involved in the failure of Sonoma Valley bank. We further learned that Madjlessi had been involved in at least three other failed developments in California in the Sonoma and Petaluma area.

I would be concerned that the Belvedere is still a target rich environment for attorneys and law suits. I can only imagine that some hungry attorney will see an opportunity in coming to aid of the vendors that lost so much by their supplying goods and services to the project.

I just can’t imagine that they will be happy seeing Madjlessi win at their expense.

So, no. I would not personally be comfortable buying a condominium in the Belvedere project.

I would welcome comments from anyone having a different opinion.

You may also be interested in . . .

Fannie Mae Discloses that it Pushed Foreclosures Over Mods

It appears that Fannie Mae lied and was pushing foreclosures instead of loan modifications as they had originally insisted.

Fannie Mae has released papers and internal memos indicating that the government-controlled GSE has been pushing its lenders to opt for foreclosure instead of loan modifications and threatening to “charge a penalty to lenders who allowed foreclosures to wait too long before they were executed” . . . Ethical arguments about this policy aside, these memos are dated from the same time that Fannie Mae officials were testifying in congressional hearings that they “were doing everything in their power to prevent foreclosures.”

Nearly everything we see coming out of Washington is complete corruption and lies.

“I am thoroughly disgusted by the actions of Fannie Mae,” said Ingham County Register of Deeds Curtis Hertel, who is currently suing Fannie Mae and other lenders arguing that they failed to pay Ingham county millions of dollars in title transfer taxes. “What these internal documents show is that while Fannie Mae was being bailed out by taxpayers they were systematically pushing for citizens to be foreclosed. The reason for this is even worse. Right now we as taxpayers pick up the cost of every foreclosure, because we pay Fannie Mae’s loss in the foreclosure process. In other words they actually get paid more for a foreclosure than for a reasonable modification.”

Neeta Delaney, co-director of the Michigan Foreclosure Task Force, had a slightly more muted response.

“We see this on a daily basis. It is what we have been characterizing as the right hand not knowing what the left hand was doing,” she said. Her coalition represents nearly 200 groups with a stake in ending the foreclosure crisis and is working to push new foreclosure related legislation through the legislature. “It’s not new news (foreclosures during modification negotiations). But the documents are new news. These documents are implying a policy behind this. It’s not just the banks being overwhelmed.”

Read more:http://michiganmessenger.com/51716/officials-angered-over-fannie-mae-disclosures

You may also be interested in . . .

Belvedere Developer and the Glassman

Bijan Madjlessi is the real estate developer that was arrested because of dual insurance claims because of a fire at the Belvedere towers condo project.

It appears that he had a history of using and abusing people.  It seems that not paying his contractors and vendors was his standard practice.

One of these vendors was Chad Empey of Petaluma, CA and it appears that he is fighting back.  He has posted videos that explain in detail how Madjlessi ran his operation.  This video is only one of many describing Madjlessi, his operation, and the corrupt bankers that enabled this fraud.

http://youtu.be/zhMpSmAS5tA

You may also be interested in . . .

Belvedere Developer also Linked to Failed Bank in CA

Bijan Madjlessi was/is the owner of the Belvedere Towers condominium project here in Reno and who had neglected to pay his property taxes resulting in the property being seized in a tax foreclosure by Washoe county.

Madjlessi has also been arrested in California for insurance fraud because he filed insurance claims on two separate policies.

Now, it appears that Madjlessi has a very busy man.  He is also linked to the failure of the Sonoma Valley Bank that had three branches in the Sonoma Valley area of CA.

When Sonoma Valley Bank granted him a loan he had already defaulted on a loan from IndyMac bank for the same project.

At the center of the bank’s downfall is a series of large loans made to a small group of North Bay developers who were behind three Sonoma County projects that fell into foreclosure over the past few years.

The bank continued to fund the projects even after it became public in land records and lawsuits that the developers were defaulting on multimillion-dollar loans from other banks and were not paying construction contractors.

At this time I am aware of at least two other failed real estate projects.  He blamed the bad economy.

Read more here.

You may also be interested in . . .

Belvedere Developer Arrested for Insurance Fraud

California Insurance Department officers arrested Madjlessi last week for insurance fraud.

Bijan Madjlessi, who controls the Belvedere Towers condominium project in downtown Reno, has been charged with felony insurance fraud in making multiple claims for losses after the building caught fire nearly three years ago.

Possibly the more interesting parts of the story are the comments that follow.

Read the article here.

You may also be interested in . . .

Couple Battles Wells Fargo Bank

Here’s an interesting story about a couple taking on Wells Fargo.  The accused Wells Fargo of funding a home here in Reno based on a fraudulent appraisal which inflated the value of the home by $200,000.

From my vantage point the story is loaded with too many inconsistencies and sounds much like someone playing the victim card too loud and too often.

According to the Vieiras, the mortgage loan they took out in 2005 with Wells Fargo was based on a fraudulent appraisal that inflated the property’s value by more than $200,000. The appraisal was ordered by the bank and determined the couple’s mortgage, which they were eventually unable to pay, like tens of thousands of other homeowners across the country.

I’m not aware of any cases where appraisals are used to determine anyone’s mortgage.  They are used to determine the value of the property, supposedly to protect the bank’s interest.

The Vieiras said they were first late for their mortgage payment in September, 2009; Wells Fargo foreclosed on the home in June, 2010. Nuno, who is an appraiser himself, said the original home appraisal set him and his wife up for an unwieldy mortgage, and even though it was ruled fraudulent, the couple had no legal recourse.

Notice that even though Nuno is and appraiser himself, he was willing to complete the purchase without disputing the price.  He apparently agreed with the appraisal ath that time.

The Vieiras claim that they have been fighting this battle for the last 6 years.   They purchased a home in Reno, Nevada in 2005.  Coincidentally, that happens to be about 6 years ago.  That would suggest that they had been fighting Wells since the day they closed their escrow.  The home was foreclosed in June of 2010.

I must admit that I’m not always a fan of the banks, but this time I side with Wells.

Read the rest:

http://sanleandro.patch.com/articles/local-couple-takes-on-wells-fargo-bank

You may also be interested in . . .

Another Court Rules Against MERS

Once again a court ruled against MERS, The Mortgage Electronic Registration System, again due to lack of standing.

A California bankruptcy court says Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems cannot help a trustee establish legal standing to foreclose on a securitized mortgage unless the trustee already possesses an actual assignment of interest in the loan.

Read the story here.

You may also be interested in . . .