Category Archives: Mortgage Fraud

Freddie Mac Lied to the Nation

If you ever bought or even tried to buy a short sale you are aware of the problems and difficulty in completing the transaction.  You might have wondered, “how could the banks be so obstinate?”

We now learn that even though the banks may have been difficult to work with, much of the problem came from the government in the name of Freddie Mac.  “But, I thought the government wanted to help us,” you say.

Freddie went out of their way to paint the investors as the enemy.  They issued policy letters describing potential mortgage fraud with the intention of making the investor out to be the criminal.  The only problem was that Freddie itself was the real fraudster.

The truth is that Freddie Mac actually placed their bets against the housing crisis actually ever getting solved.  Freddie made money whenever they were able to stop a short sale.  Freddie benefited whenever the rest of us lost.

For more than a year, Freddie Mac has adopted numerous policies designed to prevent the private purchase of toxic assets and forced servicers to enforce these policies. Demands for unreasonable offers on short sales, delays in processing short sales, affidavits preventing resale of their properties after being rehabbed and deed restrictions on real-estate-owned properties restricting resale price are among the myriad obstacles private buyers face in trying to buy Freddie’s inventory.

Besides delaying the unwinding of the troubled entity, several of these policies may in fact be illegal. Restricting the ability of private buyers to resell their properties and attempting to dictate resale value constitute unreasonable restraint on alienation. In plain English, once Freddie sells one of its toxic assets, it has no standing in future transactions related to the property.

Freddie has attempted to justify these policies through a taxpayer-funded media campaign arguing that the act of buying, rehabbing and reselling a property constitutes a crime and is inherently an act of fraud. Both Freddie and Fannie Mae have worked with enforcement officials to convince them of this lie. To the embarrassment of these enforcement officials, Freddie left out one important detail: Every time it stopped a short sale, Freddie made money.

Read more: http://www.rollcall.com/issues/57_96/john_grant_end_freddie_mac_policies_against_private_market-212409-1.html?pos=oopih

You may also be interested in . . .

Nevada Notaries Charged With Fraudulent Foreclosure Documents

Just in case you may have forgotten about the robo-signing scandal that first came to light in Florida, I thought that I might jar your memory. Florida happens to be a judicial foreclosure state while Nevada is non-judicial. In Florida’s case, the fraudulent document signers work ended up in court. But, the foreclosures in Nevada were for the most part settled at public auction on the court house steps. These never had to face a judge.

Now, it has come to light that Nevada is not immune for fraudulent signing. At least three notaries have now been charged with notarizing documents without actually witnessing the signing.

The three notaries had all worked for LPS, (Lender Processing Service) to handle paperwork for the banks. This is the same company at the center of the problem in Florida. Apparently, they had such a workload such that they could never witness every document within the time allotted.

The problems here, were addressed in AB 284. Now the foreclosing entity must certify that their documents are in order. The end result is that foreclosures will now take longer to complete the process.

Read More: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505245_162-57337111/3-nevada-notaries-named-in-foreclosure-fraud-case/

You may also be interested in . . .

New Short Sale Rules From Freddie Mac

Effective Jan, 1, 2012 everyone involved with Freddie Mac short sales will be required to sign an affidavit and be held liable for any misrepresentations they may have caused. This is purportedly to ensure that the transaction is at arms length.

In August, the government-sponsored enterprise alerted real estate agents to the rise in shady short sale deals. The main concern is flopping. There is a growing trend of real estate agents on the buy-side of the deal failing to disclose other bids on the property, rigging the sale at a lower price.

This was based on the theory that if a buyer flipped the property and made a profit, the deal must have defrauded the bank. If we extend this concept then every business that buys a product or service and re-sells it at a higher price would be committing fraud. We know that any merchant that doesn’t make a profit soon goes out of business.

We must realize that this absurd notion comes from the government where little makes any sense. But take care because they will look for any excuse to make an example of you.

This is from the same Fannie and Freddie that has already cost the taxpayers $169 billion and have paid huge bonuses to their executives for losing money.

How big are the paychecks going to top Fannie and Freddie executives? Big. Really, really big. Since the agencies went into conservatorship, Fannie and Freddie’s top six executives have received $35 million in compensation, including millions in bonuses, even as borrowers struggled to keep their homes and got no meaningful relief.

Read more:

You may also be interested in . . .

Would I buy a Belvedere Condominium?

My posts on this blog about the Belvedere condominium project and developer Bijan Madjlessi generated more interest than any other so far. Readers have even contacted me asking what I thought about buying units in the project.

I must begin with this disclaimer because except for what I have read or learned in newspaper or other reports my direct knowledge of the Belvedere is almost nonexistent. I’ve never been in the Belvedere nor have I ever met any of the players that I am aware of. As I said the extent of my knowledge has come only from news articles or from comments on this or other blogs. Therefore I believe I am not qualified to recommend in any way either positive or negative about the benefits of purchasing a Belvedere condominium unit.

My concern with the Belvedere project is that I am not convinced that the legal difficulties are yet over. There are some other reasons that I do not like condominiums but I will save that for another time.

As we have learned from the Reno Gazette Journal, the Belvedere condominiums were purchased at a Washoe County tax foreclosure sale by David Lonich, the attorney for Madjlessi. It would appear to me that Lonich is nothing but the straw buyer for Madjlessi.

We learned that Madjlessi failed to pay his mortgages, failed to pay his vendors, and failed to pay property taxes, thus resulting in tax foreclosure.

We learned that Madjlessi had been arrested in California for insurance fraud. Then as information began to grow we learned that Madjlessi was involved in the failure of Sonoma Valley bank. We further learned that Madjlessi had been involved in at least three other failed developments in California in the Sonoma and Petaluma area.

I would be concerned that the Belvedere is still a target rich environment for attorneys and law suits. I can only imagine that some hungry attorney will see an opportunity in coming to aid of the vendors that lost so much by their supplying goods and services to the project.

I just can’t imagine that they will be happy seeing Madjlessi win at their expense.

So, no. I would not personally be comfortable buying a condominium in the Belvedere project.

I would welcome comments from anyone having a different opinion.

You may also be interested in . . .

State of Washington Sues B of A over Foreclosures

The Washington state Attorney General filed suit against Bank of America over its foreclosure practices. Bank of America denies the charges.

Attorney General Rob McKenna alleged that a unit of Bank of America Corp. that handles foreclosures on behalf of the bank had improperly executed thousands of foreclosures over the last three years. The suit alleges that ReconTrust Co., a wholly owned BofA subsidiary that serves as a trustee in foreclosure sales, didn’t act in good faith when foreclosing on homeowners.

Washington is one of 27 so-called “non-judicial” states where, rather than going before a judge to foreclose, banks hire a trustee to carry out an administrative process that varies slightly from state to state. Trustees notify homeowners that they are in default and, if the borrower doesn’t become current or work out a modification, the trustee eventually carries out the foreclosure.

The lawsuit alleges that ReconTrust “committed unfair and deceptive acts” by failing to act as a neutral party between borrowers and lenders. ReconTrust “has failed to comply” with state foreclosure law “in each and every foreclosure it has conducted since at least June 12, 2008,” said the lawsuit.

The Washington lawsuit has listed a number of violations of Washington law and is asking for a court injunction against the foreclosures and fines for every violation.
Read more.

You may also be interested in . . .

Belvedere Developer and the Glassman

Bijan Madjlessi is the real estate developer that was arrested because of dual insurance claims because of a fire at the Belvedere towers condo project.

It appears that he had a history of using and abusing people.  It seems that not paying his contractors and vendors was his standard practice.

One of these vendors was Chad Empey of Petaluma, CA and it appears that he is fighting back.  He has posted videos that explain in detail how Madjlessi ran his operation.  This video is only one of many describing Madjlessi, his operation, and the corrupt bankers that enabled this fraud.

http://youtu.be/zhMpSmAS5tA

You may also be interested in . . .

Couple Battles Wells Fargo Bank

Here’s an interesting story about a couple taking on Wells Fargo.  The accused Wells Fargo of funding a home here in Reno based on a fraudulent appraisal which inflated the value of the home by $200,000.

From my vantage point the story is loaded with too many inconsistencies and sounds much like someone playing the victim card too loud and too often.

According to the Vieiras, the mortgage loan they took out in 2005 with Wells Fargo was based on a fraudulent appraisal that inflated the property’s value by more than $200,000. The appraisal was ordered by the bank and determined the couple’s mortgage, which they were eventually unable to pay, like tens of thousands of other homeowners across the country.

I’m not aware of any cases where appraisals are used to determine anyone’s mortgage.  They are used to determine the value of the property, supposedly to protect the bank’s interest.

The Vieiras said they were first late for their mortgage payment in September, 2009; Wells Fargo foreclosed on the home in June, 2010. Nuno, who is an appraiser himself, said the original home appraisal set him and his wife up for an unwieldy mortgage, and even though it was ruled fraudulent, the couple had no legal recourse.

Notice that even though Nuno is and appraiser himself, he was willing to complete the purchase without disputing the price.  He apparently agreed with the appraisal ath that time.

The Vieiras claim that they have been fighting this battle for the last 6 years.   They purchased a home in Reno, Nevada in 2005.  Coincidentally, that happens to be about 6 years ago.  That would suggest that they had been fighting Wells since the day they closed their escrow.  The home was foreclosed in June of 2010.

I must admit that I’m not always a fan of the banks, but this time I side with Wells.

Read the rest:

http://sanleandro.patch.com/articles/local-couple-takes-on-wells-fargo-bank

You may also be interested in . . .

Another Court Rules Against MERS

Once again a court ruled against MERS, The Mortgage Electronic Registration System, again due to lack of standing.

A California bankruptcy court says Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems cannot help a trustee establish legal standing to foreclose on a securitized mortgage unless the trustee already possesses an actual assignment of interest in the loan.

Read the story here.

You may also be interested in . . .

Identity Theft and Your Mortgage Payment

If you happen to receive any correspondence that tells you that the servicing of your mortgage loan has been transferred from your regular bank  to another servicer, double check with your old servicer.  Some scammers in the Las Vegas area had developed a new wrinkle to identity theft.  

This time, instead of stealing individual idientities, they stole the corporate identity of Bank of America.  I guess this means that if you are going to steal you might as well go big.

The scam involved sending letters to homeowners falsely stating that servicing of the homeowners’ loans had been transferred from Bank of America to Great Western Business Services. The letters instruct homeowners to send their mortgage payments to Great Western Business Services instead of the true servicer, Bank of America.


The alleged scam would result in victims unknowingly missing one or more mortgage payments which could result in a potential notice of default and foreclosure, despite the fact that the homeowner had actually made their payments, albeit to the scammers instead of their true loan servicer.

So, the bottom line was that not only did B of A not receive their payments, the payor was now suddenly delinquent.

At least in this case, the perpetrators have been arrested.

But, once again, verify any communication you might receive from the bank.

Also see this story.

You may also be interested in . . .

MERS, Robo-Signers and Foreclosures

If you have been following the stories of MERS (Mortgage Electronic Registration System) involvement in the foreclosure crisis you are well aware of MERS and the robo-signers. Courts have been routinely ruling against MERS and the banks. The banks have dismal record keeping procedures and the courts have ruled in favor of the homeowners.

Let’s examine one possible bank scenario. Bank A makes the loan on a home and secures the loan with a mortgage. Bank A then sells the note and mortgage to bank B, who in turn sells it to bank C, who eventually sells the note and mortgage to an investor. The investor typically could be a pension fund or an insurance company. The actual process might be significantly more complex, but for this instance we will go with the above. MERS may not even be involved. Now, each of these additional transfers of the mortgage is supposed to be recorded by the county recorder. This is where the banks have skirted the law because each recording costs money and recording may even trigger additional taxes.

Next, the homeowner defaults on his payments, and the lender forecloses on the home. The practice has been that bank A, who made the original loan, conducts the foreclosure. The only problem is that bank A is no longer the owner of the note and no longer has legal standing in the case, and consequently has no right to foreclose. Only the owner of the note has that right, and they have tried to remain anonymous. This is the reason judges have been ruling against the banks and against MERS.

The situation may have just come to a head in a case involving U.S. Bancorp and another involving Wells Fargo. Neither of these cases involved MERS. The Massachusetts Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, ruled that neither Wells Fargo nor U.S. Bancorp have standing and consequently have no right to foreclose because they failed to show that they were holders of the mortgages at the time of foreclosure.

Massachusetts Supreme Court Justice Robert Cordy, in a concurring opinion, blasted the banks for the “utter carelessness” they demonstrated in documenting their right to own the properties.

This ruling is expected to slow down the foreclosures significantly and consequently significantly affect the entire home loan process and market place.

Massachusetts is one of 27 non-judicial foreclosure states. If the banks were playing fast and loose in Massachusetts, what is the likelihood that they would have operated differently in any of the other non-judicial states?

Do we face the prospect of having foreclosures overturned too?

You may also be interested in . . .