Category Archives: Real estate news

MERS Wins One in Nevada Too

It looks like MERS has won another case, this time in Nevada. In the case of Volkes vs. BAC Home Loans Servicing the court ruled in favor of the defendant.

The Nevada Supreme court ruled that the MERS assignment was valid.

It was not clearly erroneous for the district court to determine that
the MERS assignment was valid.

The appellants also claimed BAC did not participate in mediation in good faith, but that claim was apparently not included for judicial review.

Apparently this link is to an unpublished order, and cannot be considered precedent.

Read the order: http://www.buckleysandler.com/uploads/104/doc/volkes-v-bac-2-24-12.pdf

You may also be interested in . . .

Prices and Sales Up for Las Vegas, Inventory Down

February single-family home sales in Las Vegas and their median price increased from the previous month, while the inventory of homes available for sale continued to decline.

The median price was up 2.5 percent from the prior month at $121,000, even though it’s down 5.5 percent from a year ago.

Inventory declined to 18,870 from a peak of more than 24,000 in 2007 to to 18,870 today. Only 6,543 units are available without contingent or pending offers.

Do you think Reno, too has hit the bottom?

Read more: http://www.lvrj.com/business/home-sales-prices-rise-inventory-dips-141878223.html

You may also be interested in . . .

MERS Wins Case in Kentucky

The U.S. Court for the Western District of Kentucky, Paducah Division, has ruled in favor of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (MERS). The case was filed against MERS by the clerks of two Kentucky counties where they sought to collect the recording fees that the banks avoided by using MERS.

Kentucky law, like most other states specifies that when a loan is assigned the holder of the loan must record the assignment within 30 days. It appears to me that MERS did NOT comply with Kentucky law and may still face some consequences. But, the judge ruled that the county clerks had no standing in the case because the law was designed to protect the property owner, not the clerks.

First, the county clerks are not members of the class of persons the General Assembly intended to protect by the recording statutes cited by Plaintiffs. Here, the class of persons intended to be protected by Kentucky’s land recording system consists of existing lienholders seeking to give notice of their secured status; prospective purchasers and creditors seeking information about prior liens; and owners of property seeking release of liens once debts are paid off.

And:

The purpose of the statutes cited by Plaintiffs is to assure that liens are discharged when an underlying loan is paid off, to give subsequent purchasers and lenders notice of recorded liens, and to allow creditors to give notice of their secured interest in the property.

The suit was dismissed with prejudice.

Read more: http://nationalmortgageprofessional.com/news28486/legal-action-against-mers-dropped-kentucky

And the ruling: http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?page=1&xmldoc=In%20FDCO%2020120221C28.xml&docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR&SizeDisp=7

You may also be interested in . . .

Evicting Tenants Using a Tractor

Here is a novel eviction technique, but I don’t suggest you try it. Paul Finman in northern Idaho had been trying to get the occupants of his house (I understand that they were not paying rent so that makes them occupants and not tenants) for 18 months.

The occupants were a family of “sovereign citizens”, folks that don’t recognize the legitimacy of the government. They must also have not recognized the legitimacy of the landlord either.

Apparently, he decided to solve his problem on his own. Using a farm tractor with an end loader he began dis-assembling the house. Three of the occupants, the wife and two children, were inside and fled. The husband was not present at the time. Of course, this action got the sheriff involved and they arrested Finman, charging him with three counts of assault.

Finman eventually pled guilty to disturbing the peace and received a sentence of 180 days, which was suspended after two days. He was also fined $400 and costs.

It would appear that it cost him a lot less here than a regular eviction.

Who wants to try it here?

Read more on eviction.

You may also be interested in . . .

FHA Loans Soon to Become More Expensive

Do you need/want an FHA loan? It will soon get more expensive.

Expect to pay more. FHA needs the money and thinks you can afford it. The new fees are set to begin April 1 of this year.

Even though FHA itself doesn’t make the loans, it insures them.

First, the mortgage insurance premium will rise from 1.15% to 1.25% for loans under $625,000. The premium will be even larger for larger loans.

FHA will also increase the upfront mortgage premium from 1.0% to 1.75&.

According to The New York Times, a borrower with a 3.5 percent down payment with a mortgage of $193,000 can expect to pay an upfront mortgage premium alone of $3,377, compared to the prior $1,930

The premium can be rolled into the mortgage.

The FHA expects to raise $1.25 Billion additional revenue by Sept. 2013.

The NAR (Realtors) is strongly opposed to this action.

Read more on mortgage fees.

You may also be interested in . . .

Is the Reno Real Estate Market Finally Looking Up?

I’ve seen rosy predictions before.  I don’t know if real estate agents could do anything else.  After all, their livlihood depends on it.  Else, how could they sell something they thought to be a loser.  And don’t assume by this that I think the agents fib about their marketplace.  I’m not suggesting that at all.

So, I refer you to this article in NNBW by Kevin Annis about the Reno-area office market and I read it to mean that he thinks things are looking up.

Northern Nevada businesses will realize the worst is behind us. I recognize that this is not a measurable prediction; however, it certainly is worth recognizing. Companies that have weathered the economic storm have made it past the worst of it and will begin reinvesting in local economy.

For me, maybe – and maybe not.

Read more: http://www.nnbw.com/ArticleRead.aspx?storyID=18719

You may also be interested in . . .

Freddie Mac Lied to the Nation

If you ever bought or even tried to buy a short sale you are aware of the problems and difficulty in completing the transaction.  You might have wondered, “how could the banks be so obstinate?”

We now learn that even though the banks may have been difficult to work with, much of the problem came from the government in the name of Freddie Mac.  “But, I thought the government wanted to help us,” you say.

Freddie went out of their way to paint the investors as the enemy.  They issued policy letters describing potential mortgage fraud with the intention of making the investor out to be the criminal.  The only problem was that Freddie itself was the real fraudster.

The truth is that Freddie Mac actually placed their bets against the housing crisis actually ever getting solved.  Freddie made money whenever they were able to stop a short sale.  Freddie benefited whenever the rest of us lost.

For more than a year, Freddie Mac has adopted numerous policies designed to prevent the private purchase of toxic assets and forced servicers to enforce these policies. Demands for unreasonable offers on short sales, delays in processing short sales, affidavits preventing resale of their properties after being rehabbed and deed restrictions on real-estate-owned properties restricting resale price are among the myriad obstacles private buyers face in trying to buy Freddie’s inventory.

Besides delaying the unwinding of the troubled entity, several of these policies may in fact be illegal. Restricting the ability of private buyers to resell their properties and attempting to dictate resale value constitute unreasonable restraint on alienation. In plain English, once Freddie sells one of its toxic assets, it has no standing in future transactions related to the property.

Freddie has attempted to justify these policies through a taxpayer-funded media campaign arguing that the act of buying, rehabbing and reselling a property constitutes a crime and is inherently an act of fraud. Both Freddie and Fannie Mae have worked with enforcement officials to convince them of this lie. To the embarrassment of these enforcement officials, Freddie left out one important detail: Every time it stopped a short sale, Freddie made money.

Read more: http://www.rollcall.com/issues/57_96/john_grant_end_freddie_mac_policies_against_private_market-212409-1.html?pos=oopih

You may also be interested in . . .

Foreclosure Activity Likely to Increase This Year

We can expect a large increase on foreclosure activity this year. At least, that’s what the LA Times thinks. Foreclosure activity has been suppressed because the lenders have been focusing on getting their act together. Here in Nevada they face an added burden of AB 284 which forces them to certify that all their paperwork is in order.

But, they are beginning to work through their backlog so we can expect an increase in activity.

The state’s difficulties were reflected in RealtyTrac’s report, which showed California with the third-highest incidence of foreclosure filings in 2011, behind only Nevada and Arizona.

Analysts also expect CA to stabilize quickly due to their fairly fast timeline. Nevada, on the other hand, is hampered by the effect of AB-284.

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-foreclosures-20120112,0,7066381.story?track=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+latimes%2Fbusiness+%28L.A.+Times+-+Business%29

You may also be interested in . . .

Foreclosure Starts are Down Across the West

Foreclosure starts are down all across the West Coast for December. Reduced filings were reported in California, Nevada and Washington. Nevada showed drops of 14%.

According to ForeclosureRadar the drops were due to the closing of trustee sale locations in California. Riverside County passed an ordinance prohibiting solicitation on all County property. California law only specifies that the location must be within the County where the property is located and must be published in the Notice of Sale. Nevada law states

2. All sales of real property must be made:
(a) In a county with a population of less than 100,000, at the courthouse in the county in which the property or some part thereof is situated.
(b) In a county with a population of 100,000 or more, at the public location in the county designated by the governing body of the county for that purpose.

Here in Reno trustee sales are conducted on the steps of the Court House on Virginia Street.

The slow down in Nevada was attributed to AB 284 which established new foreclosure rules requiring the lender and trustee to certify that they have done everything correctly.

“Nevada’s new foreclosure rules appear on track to bring a near complete halt to foreclosures in that state,” said Sean O’Toole, founder and chief executive officer of ForeclosureRadar.

“In the near term this will certainly help homeowners who were facing foreclosure, eviction, and potentially deficiency judgements. Longer term, we believe there will be unintended consequences for the state as business declines for the many real estate related companies that would normally service, resell and finance those foreclosures.”

Read more: http://www.housingwire.com/2012/01/13/foreclosure-starts-drop-across-the-west-coast?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+housingwire%2FuOVI+%28HousingWire%29

You may also be interested in . . .

Foreclosure Rate Heat Map for Nevada

We know that Nevada leads the nation in foreclosures but seldom with little supporting data.

This heat map from RealtyTrac shows the foreclosure data for Nevada county by county. One out of 177 housing units received a foreclosure filing in December, 2011. Washoe County had one for every 318 housing units. Surprisingly, Lyon County even topped Clark county with 1 for every 144 units. All this compares with 1 for every 634 units nationwide. Check it out.

You may also be interested in . . .